Re: best cheap/free scores 1.1
My opinion doesn't matter. Rather, it's the guarantees that we make to the business/agencies who donate the items to us. Can't risk someone being clever enough to inquire: "And, what happens if the drive doesn't spin up so you can wipe it? Or, what happens if a sector gets remapped on or before you overwrite it? How do we know that our data is still safe? How do our patients, partners, clients, suppliers, contractors, etc. know that THEIR data -- in our custody -- is safe??" Show them the mangled drive so they can see we've addressed that possibility.
[We used to shred the drives-to-be-destroyed but that left a window where they are in limbo as we would wait to have a few thousand pounds of drives before shredding. As such, you have to keep them "secured" while waiting. We also tried drilling the platters but that takes a lot of time/labor and risks someone getting injured (mindless, repetitive task). We can "snap" drives within minutes of determining they are defective -- all day long!]
We invite donors to try to recover anything off of any of the drives after they've been "processed" (and, they have the right to do so by way of spontaneous audits). We sure don't want to risk losing all of those thousands of FREELY DONATED machines just because someone was sloppy in wiping a drive (or NVRAM inside a machine)!
[There's still a window of coincidence in which a "wiped drive might opt to fail after wiping and before an audit. In that case, the good will we've earned by our procedures gives us the benefit of the doubt -- hasn't happened, yet...]
Originally posted by momaka
View Post
[We used to shred the drives-to-be-destroyed but that left a window where they are in limbo as we would wait to have a few thousand pounds of drives before shredding. As such, you have to keep them "secured" while waiting. We also tried drilling the platters but that takes a lot of time/labor and risks someone getting injured (mindless, repetitive task). We can "snap" drives within minutes of determining they are defective -- all day long!]
We invite donors to try to recover anything off of any of the drives after they've been "processed" (and, they have the right to do so by way of spontaneous audits). We sure don't want to risk losing all of those thousands of FREELY DONATED machines just because someone was sloppy in wiping a drive (or NVRAM inside a machine)!
[There's still a window of coincidence in which a "wiped drive might opt to fail after wiping and before an audit. In that case, the good will we've earned by our procedures gives us the benefit of the doubt -- hasn't happened, yet...]
Comment