Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

[eccerr0r]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

(and I still can't explain why it thinks it has no disk space left, it looks like it has plenty... perhaps the win98 msvcrt.dll has unintended side effects when running on win95...)

[eccerr0r]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

Should test my 40MB IDE drive to see if it still works...

[Topcat]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

On a related note, the 850MB drive that I have installed in there failed earlier this evening. Powered on and calibrated fine, then suddenly got the click-of-death when I reset the system after several hours of idling. I'm guessing either mechanical failure

...and that's what you'll get; continually with ~30yr old mechanical devices, especially hard disks.... At the risk of sounding repetitive; CF card and IDE adapter... Transcend Industrial CF's are my favorite, they can take a lot of abuse....IE, formatting and trial & error flubs....

[eccerr0r]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

Damn... wtf...

Incidentally, this thing takes a minute to load the self extract installer .exe file stuck at 0% and goes 18MB into swap ... and due to the CF card, it's so quiet I can't tell this thing is madly thrashing while trying to work with the installer...

[eccerr0r]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival



Probably mechanical failure/bit rot of tracking encoding. Highly doubt it's BIOS related unless you have a drive with a firmware bug that allows destruction of drive...

[TechGeek]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

The 428MB Seagate drive is officially on its way...
On a related note, the 850MB drive that I have installed in there failed earlier this evening. Powered on and calibrated fine, then suddenly got the click-of-death when I reset the system after several hours of idling. I'm guessing either mechanical failure, electronics failure, or quite possibly corrupted service tracks, in part due to the system's bugged BIOS.

[stj]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

netscape & mosaic

[eccerr0r]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

As expected the Xircom works...

Now I need msvcrt.dll ... but ... wtf, was firefox never supported on win95?

What browsers were ever supported on win95? Oh no I have to go back to Netscape?

[eccerr0r]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

hmm... well, forgot when the transition happened, suspect it was prior to mainstream.

XP seemed to be before bluetooth
95 before wifi... so would need a whole wifi stack software for it.

I wasn't even intending to use WPA or even WEP. Just unencrypted, with HTTPS and SSH... (btw yes people could wardrive to this particular unencrypted/unprotected WAP. Except the would quickly figure out you can only connect to 3 hosts... one of which is the router, one of which is the gateway which drops all unknown packets, and third of which is a VPN host. Without PKI to the VPN host, it's a login based captive portal.)

In any case the network cards I have are (all PCMCIA):
- An Symbol Spectrum 24 802.11b wifi card
- A 3c589 (D?) Ethernet (10Mbit thin/tp)
- A Xircom Ethernet (10/100 TP)

So far the 3c589 is not behaving, probably have the wrong driver installed, and the symbol spectrum I don't have a WAP browsing solution... I do vaguely recall having the Xircom working a long time ago, but haven't tried it after the hard disk failure...

[ChaosLegionnaire]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

wifi cards that support win95 are quite a rarity because when wifi took off, it was already the win2k and xp era. plus even if u get it working, the problem is the encryption standards being supported because everyone uses wpa2 for their wifi encryption these days unless u want war drivers leeching your wifi with no encryption or weak wep encryption.

so in verbose, if u want wifi working on a computer, u need two things: 1. wifi driver support for the os in question and 2. a wifi client utility (typically from the manufacturer) that also supports the os in question. the wifi client is needed as it provides a gui for u to key in the ssid and encryption key for the wifi network u want to connect to. so obviously without either, the wifi card is a useless paper weight.

also i dont recommend wifi with encryption on a 486. im not too confident of the 486 cpus ability to encode and decode crypto hashes so using encryption will kill (overload) the cpu unless the wifi card's docs state that the encryption can be done and offloaded to the wifi ic chip, but such info is probably unobtanium as manufacturers typically dont publish such information about their wifi cards.

my recommendation would be to get a 16 bit pcmcia ethernet card. im ass-u-ming a 486 board is too old to have pci slots so a pci ethernet card wouldnt work. and then an ethernet to wireless bridge with wpa2 encryption. that should take the load off the 486 cpu as it doesnt need to do the wifi encryption hashing. the ethernet to wifi bridge will do it.

then probably first when u get it, connect the ethernet to wifi bridge on a recent pc with a current os with a current browser to configure the wifi connection of the bridge via web browser. beware! some ethernet to wifi bridges have shitty configuration pages via web browser. do your own research on which ones have shitty web configuration and avoid those. when its set up, then u can connect it to the 486 pc and u have wifi on your 486 win95 rig.

it also helps to update your win95 with all the service packs and updates available as the winsock layer in win95 in the early releases was too buggy and slow iirc. so updating the winsock layer in win95 helps a lot with the networking ability of win95.

EDIT: i found a couple of topics on vogons about 16 bit pcmcia wifi cards that work with win95. if yours isnt listed in those topics, it probably doesnt support or work in win95.

VOGONS - Any PCMCIA wireless LAN adapters for Windows 95 (3.x too)?
VOGONS - 16-bit PCMCIA Wireless with WPA?

[eccerr0r]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

If my 486 had been a desktop, I still have a 400MB (IDE) and 2GB (IDE) rust spinners around. They're in my K6-233 for no particular reason. Also have a few SCSI, a 700MB (SCSI2) and even a 5.25" 320MB (SCSI1) HDD. Though I dropped that case with the disk in it, not sure if it's still working... so don't forget about that option with a SCSI card...

Incidentally I forget... what kind of networking support does win95 have? I plugged in and installed drivers for an 802.11b PCMCIA card but not much luck in getting that working.
maybe I need sp1 or something, my osr1 didn't survive...

[stj]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

lba48 can be fixed in a couple of ways
one is to customise the bios if it's one that supports "modules"
the other is an extra rom on a network card

[ChaosLegionnaire]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

I wouldn't waste any time trying to hunt down a sub-528mb HDD; especially one that's actually GOOD.... Just get a 512mb CF card with an IDE adapter....and done.

yea thats a very good suggestion. im glad eccerr0r is having some good fun with your idea, reviving his win95 system on compactflash.

if i ever get down to building a p3 system, im probably going to get a 120-128gb sata ssd with an ide adapter since ide ssds are either unobtanium or u have to pay with your bodily organs. i also noticed ide ssds often only come in 2.5" form factor with a 2.5" 44-pin ide interface, requiring me to get a 3.5" ide to 2.5" ide adapter to get it to work.

anyway, the reason for this 120-128gb capacity is because i noticed p3 boards typically dont support lba48 so u are limited to 128GiB drives max. i could also try sd or micro-sd cards with an ide adapter but 128gb sd/micro-sd/cf cards seem to be more expensive compared to a 128gb sata ssd.

[eccerr0r]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

It's running as fast as I remember it... but I never had much software on this computer as it was never a main computer.

I have no network for it yet, but supposedly I did save a copy of the wifi and lan drivers (PCMCIA). I do recall putty working on this machine way back when.

No web browser that I know of ... yet...

I'm using a 512MB CF card at the moment. It's not really that much faster than before, except now I don't hear the clicking of the drive anymore. Totally silent now, unlike when I was using the 528MB drive that croaked.

[TechGeek]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

Yay was able to extract win95 from the failed CDRs and got a basic install on my 486dx4/75 on a 512M CF card. At 16MB RAM, don't think I'd want anything newer.

Now need to find drivers...

Nice! How's the responsiveness?

[eccerr0r]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

Yay was able to extract win95 from the failed CDRs and got a basic install on my 486dx4/75 on a 512M CF card. At 16MB RAM, don't think I'd want anything newer.

Now need to find drivers...

[TechGeek]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

I've got an early-'00s Plextor IDE CD burner that works like a champ. I reserve it for systems that I trust to not blow everything attached to their power supply to high heaven.

[Topcat]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

i find that shit cdr's that modern drives cant read are often still readable on *decent*(SCSI) drives like Plextor and Toshiba, probably NEC too but i dont have any to try.

This is true to some degree, I have plenty of old world scsi plextor's here....but even those wouldn't read some of my old dark blue 650mb Verbatim 90's era CD-R's....but some would, but struggled. Glad I made the archive!

[stj]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

i find that shit cdr's that modern drives cant read are often still readable on *decent*(SCSI) drives like Plextor and Toshiba, probably NEC too but i dont have any to try.

[Topcat]

Re: Gateway 80486-DX2/50 Revival

ugh...can't read my old cd-r's anymore... sigh. bitrot...

That's why about 15yrs ago I copied all their data to the NAS..... Many CDR's written back in the 90's packed with blissful things don't read anymore... I can reproduce them if I have to. Yea, I know....too little too late in your case....but I saw that coming (bitrot)!!