HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

[ChaosLegionnaire]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

and your'e wrong about blu-ray, HD 2000 supports hardware H.264 decoding

i was referring to the 3d video decoding support NOT the 2d video decoding. the hd 2000 can decode 2d h264 video but not 3d mvc h264.

[ivtec]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

i was referring to the 3d video decoding support NOT the 2d video decoding. the hd 2000 can decode 2d h264 video but not 3d mvc h264.

Thanks; so i assume that i'm good with Hd2000 ,since i only stream up to 1080p top ?

[ivtec]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

Thanks; so i assume that i'm good with Hd2000 ,since i only stream up to 1080p top ?

check this video;

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6LQCcER5Q0

[ivtec]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gp...Radeon+HD+6450
and
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/gp...D+Family&id=37

The Intel HD graphics is much more powerful than a 6450, and is about the same as a GF 620.

Also the Hd 6450 card shown on the test is only 512 mem mine is 1g mem,does this has any difference?


http://www.amazon.com/Asus-Radeon-Si...o+cars+hd+6450

[c_hegge]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

^
No. The amount of memory on the graphics card has no impact on performance (at least not once you get above about 128MB). It's all down to the GPU.

[ChaosLegionnaire]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

the video u posted is that of a gaming benchmark. gaming performance has got nothing to do with video decoding performance. they use different parts of the gpu during gaming and video decoding.

i remember reading somewhere saying that u need 128mb of video ram for viewing sd videos, 256mb for fhd videos and 512mb for uhd 4k videos. other than that the video ram doesnt make a practical difference.

[ivtec]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

the video u posted is that of a gaming benchmark. gaming performance has got nothing to do with video decoding performance. they use different parts of the gpu during gaming and video decoding.

i remember reading somewhere saying that u need 128mb of video ram for viewing sd videos, 256mb for fhd videos and 512mb for uhd 4k videos. other than that the video ram doesnt make a practical difference.

Thanks folks for this info: i did try to use the IGT hd2000 with the other lenovo thinkcenter same motherboard H61 M series with DVI and VGA outputs to HD TV and Hd monitor, all good but only one problem, with DVI to HDMI i have over-scan and i can't use the computer on the LCD vizio display due to over-scan,and don't see no over-scan controls so i can fit the screen on the TV, with VGA it's ok but video is not as good,this is on Ubuntu 14.04 OPS, so went back to discrete Ati HD 6450 card,where i have the Ati Catalytic controls for over scan,

now ordered a Display-port to Hdmi cable, since the other same Lenovo Thinkcenter M series chip set H65 with OPS Win 10 has Display-port and Vga outputs,
hope it won't happen the something the over-scan issue! otherwise i have to be obligated to use the Discrete Ati HD 6450 instead. i will keep you posted.

[Uranium-235]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

Thanks folks for this info: i did try to use the IGT hd2000 with the other lenovo thinkcenter same motherboard H61 M series with DVI and VGA outputs to HD TV and Hd monitor, all good but only one problem, with DVI to HDMI i have over-scan and i can't use the computer on the LCD vizio display due to over-scan,and don't see no over-scan controls so i can fit the screen on the TV, with VGA it's ok but video is not as good,this is on Ubuntu 14.04 OPS, so went back to discrete Ati HD 6450 card,where i have the Ati Catalytic controls for over scan,

now ordered a Display-port to Hdmi cable, since the other same Lenovo Thinkcenter M series chip set H65 with OPS Win 10 has Display-port and Vga outputs,
hope it won't happen the something the over-scan issue! otherwise i have to be obligated to use the Discrete Ati HD 6450 instead. i will keep you posted.

there is no overscan on digital. i'm sure vizio is to blame for as they're a crappy brand. check the TV zoom levels

[ratdude747]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

^
No. The amount of memory on the graphics card has no impact on performance (at least not once you get above about 128MB). It's all down to the GPU.

Depends on application. It won't make or break a card, but in intense applications it can help.

[Uranium-235]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

Depends on application. It won't make or break a card, but in intense applications it can help.

yeah, gaming, it can, if it's real 3d gaming with large textures and frame sizes, shaders, maps, etc.

but honestly, for win7, if the cmos lets me have a choice I change it to 32M, and it makes no difference for the areo score

hardware buffering of HD videos, it can make a difference. Anything 4k even my i5 lags on, and it never let me choose my apu memory. But the problem is CPU power, as I've looked at my core percentages and it's 100% across all cores decoding youtube 4k, or 1080p@60fps (it fluxates framerates, but its not as bad as the lag I get from 4k)

and this is an ivy bridge i5 3230 /w a 7.1 cpu score

[ivtec]

Re: HD 2000 vs Ati HD 6450 for Flash player!

there is no overscan on digital. i'm sure vizio is to blame for as they're a crappy brand. check the TV zoom levels

Uranium you're right; the problem is my Vizio but for now i have to live with it,
and the Ati HD6450 is doing a good job on the Ati Catalytic control,that's why i decided to keep it instead of changing to the IGT hd2000 and canceled the Display-pot to HDMI cable because i learned it would do the same thing as the DVI, the over-scan on Vizio tv,besides i also learned that the buffering and other issues on Fubotv streaming site were their fault, but now they have changed and structured their streaming site and lately i have no issues,so now i'm happy with the Ati HD 6450.