I am looking for a new server for a company on a budget, i have been offered a new HP Compaq Proliant ProLiant ML350 G3 or G4 for a good price. The G3 has ServerWorks Grand Champion-LE chipset and the G4 has Intel E7520 Nocona chipset. These are basically entry level Xeon servers which would be provided with 3 34gb hdd in raid-5 config. They are 5U :o pedestal or rackmount 8) chassis.
What i am interested to know is who manufactures the motherboards. For instance MSI is oem manufacturing IBM servers now :o :o :o . Anybody have any idea if the proliant servers have crap caps.
The second question is whether it is best to go with the serverworks or with the nocona. Nocona is getting much criticism due to incompatibility with some PCI-X cards. They are to issue a modified chipset to fix this. On the other hand the serverworks is criticised for low performance.
The third question is whether to go with windows 2003 server for file and print services or windows 2000 server.
The fourth question is that because this is a pedestal server modified for rackmount (that is why it is so cheap) the hdd drives are mounted vertically. Since SCSI drives are expensive could less life be expected from the drives because of the vertical mounting?
anybody with any ideas, your contribution is appreciated. Basically because this company is on a budget I dont want to make a bad choice.
What i am interested to know is who manufactures the motherboards. For instance MSI is oem manufacturing IBM servers now :o :o :o . Anybody have any idea if the proliant servers have crap caps.
The second question is whether it is best to go with the serverworks or with the nocona. Nocona is getting much criticism due to incompatibility with some PCI-X cards. They are to issue a modified chipset to fix this. On the other hand the serverworks is criticised for low performance.
The third question is whether to go with windows 2003 server for file and print services or windows 2000 server.
The fourth question is that because this is a pedestal server modified for rackmount (that is why it is so cheap) the hdd drives are mounted vertically. Since SCSI drives are expensive could less life be expected from the drives because of the vertical mounting?
anybody with any ideas, your contribution is appreciated. Basically because this company is on a budget I dont want to make a bad choice.
Comment